Abstract
AbstractElected representatives have more means of public-facing communication at their disposal than ever before. Several studies examine how representatives use individual mediums, but we lack a baseline understanding of legislators’ relative use patterns across platforms. Using a novel data set of the four most widely used forms of written, constituent-facing communication (press releases, e-newsletters, Facebook posts, and Twitter tweets) by members of the US House of Representatives in the 114th (2015–2017), 115th (2017–2019), and 116th (2019–2021) Congresses, we generate a baseline understanding of how representatives communicate across mediums. Our analyses show that institutional, legislator, and district characteristics correspond with differential use of mediums. These findings underscore why medium choice matters, clarifying how a researcher's choice of mediums might amplify the voices of certain legislators and dampen those of others. In addition, they provide guidance to other researchers on how to select the medium(s) that best correspond with different research aims.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference40 articles.
1. Minority opposition and asymmetric parties? Senators partisan rhetoric on Twitter;Russell;Political Research Quarterly,2020
2. The changing roles of house party leadership organizations: the House Republican Policy Committee;Meinke;Congress and the Presidency,2014
3. Glassman, M (2012) Congressional Leadership: A Resource Perspective. In Jaacob R. Straus (Ed.), Party and Procedure in the United States Congress, 15–31, Chapter 2. Rowman/Littlefield.qtoaPlease provide publisher location in Glassman (2012).
4. Socially distributing public relations: Twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media;Smith;Public Relations Review,2010
5. Representational Style in Congress
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献