The Brand New Version of Article 301 of Turkish Penal Code and the Future of Freedom of Expression Cases in Turkey

Author:

Algan Bülent

Abstract

Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code (TPC), much debated at both national and international levels, has recently been subject to an amendment aimed at clarifying its meaning and averting more distressing cases related to freedom of expression. It should be noted that the former article 301 was an amended version of article 159 of the former TPC of 1926. As Türkan Sancar rightly states in her comprehensive book on both articles 159 and 301, article 159 is an article which has been revised many times. It was amended seven times after coming into effect in 1926 (in 1936, 1938, 1946, 1961, twice in 2002, and 2003). The new TPC was introduced as a package of penal-law reform prior to the opening of negotiations for Turkish membership of the European Union, and came into effect on 1 June 2005. Article 301 stated the following:1.A person who publicly denigrates Turkishness, the Republic or the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, shall be sentenced a penalty of imprisonment for a term of six months to three years.2.A person who publicly denigrates the Government of the Republic of Turkey, the judicial bodies of the State, the military or security organizations, shall be sentenced to a penalty of imprisonment for a term of six months to two years.3.Where denigrating of Turkishness is committed by a Turkish citizen in another country, the penalty to be imposed shall be increased by one third.4.Expressions of thought intended to criticize shall not constitute a crime.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law

Reference52 articles.

1. See, Yargıtay 8. Ceza Dairesi, E. 2003/2930, K. 2004/5686, Judgment of 22 June 2004.

2. See Eur. Court H.R., Handyside v. the United Kingdom, Judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, para. 49. See also Lingens v. Austria, Judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, para. 41

3. Jersild v. Denmark, Judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, para. 37

4. Zana v. Turkey, Judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, para. 51.

5. Law no: 4744 of 6.2.2002 and Law no: 4771 of 3 August 2002. These laws were adopted as a result of the efforts for EU membership aimed at harmonizing Turkish laws with EU standards. The first one is known as the 1st Ad?ustment Law/Package, while the latter as the 2nd Ad?ustment Law/Package. See Türkan Yalçın Sancar, Türk Ceza Kanunu'nun 159. ve 312. Maddelerinde Yapılan Değişikliklerin Anlamı, 52 Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (AÜHFD) 88, 88–89 (2003).

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Architecture of the Strasbourg system of human rights;Domestic Judicial Treatment of European Court of Human Rights Case Law;2020-02-28

2. Implementing manipulative strategies in legal speech;Cognition, Communication, Discourse;2020

3. Emotions and Nationalism: Armenian Genocide as a Case Study;Sociological Forum;2018-05-09

4. Claudia Card's Concept of Social Death;Criticism and Compassion;2018-03-02

5. Criminal Law and Memory;International Criminal Justice Series;2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3