Abstract
The practice of conversion—changing from one religion to another—is certainly not a modern invention, but it takes on a new and sometimes threatening significance in a modern context characterized by censuses, elections with universal suffrage, and majority rule. In the modern world separate religions have come to be defined, like ethnic groups or nations (Barth 1969), by the boundaries between them. One can only be a refugee if one flees across an international boundary; likewise, conventionally, religious change is only labeled “conversion” if it occurs across a boundary. Thus, as boundaries have become sharper between ‘religions,' so the issue of conversion has grown in political significance.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference88 articles.
1. Joshi M. B. L. Rose 1966 Democratic Innovations in Nepal: A Case Study of Political Acculturation Berkeley University of California Press
2. Petech L 1984 Mediaeval History of Nepal (c. 750–1482) Rome ISMEO
3. Gombrich R. F. 1988 Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo London Routledge
4. Borgström B. E. 1980 The Patron and the Pancha: Village Values and Panchayat Democracy in Nepal New Delhi Vikas
5. Horton R 1971 African Conversion Africa 41 85 108
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献