Author:
NEBLO MICHAEL A.,ESTERLING KEVIN M.,KENNEDY RYAN P.,LAZER DAVID M.J.,SOKHEY ANAND E.
Abstract
Interest in deliberative theories of democracy has grown tremendously among political theorists, political scientists, activists, and even government officials. Many scholars, however, are skeptical that it is a practically viable theory, even on its own terms. They argue(inter alia)that most people dislike politics and that deliberative initiatives would amount to a paternalistic imposition. Using two large national samples investigating people's hypothetical willingness to deliberate and their actual participation in response to a real invitation to deliberate with their member of Congress, we find that (1) willingness to deliberate in the United States is much more widespread than expected, and (2) it is precisely those people less likely to participate in traditional partisan politics who are most interested in deliberative participation. They are attracted to such participation as a partial alternative to “politics as usual.”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference45 articles.
1. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
2. Luskin Robert C. , and Fishkin James S. . 2005. “Deliberative Polling, Public Opinion, and Democracy: The Case of the National Issues Convention.” Slightly revised from a paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 2–6, 1998. http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/papers/2005/issues-convention.pdf (accessed July 26, 2010).
3. The Impact of Personality on Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Political Processes: The Effects of Need to Evaluate
Cited by
292 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献