Abstract
Policymaking is hard. Policymakers typically have imperfect information about which policies produce which outcomes, and they are left with little choice but to fumble their way through the policy space via a trial-and-error process. This raises a question at the heart of democracy: Do democratic systems identify good policies? To answer this question I introduce a novel model of policymaking in complex environments. I show that good policies are often but not always found and I identify the possibility of policymaking getting stuck at outcomes that are arbitrarily bad. Notably, policy stickiness occurs in the model even in the absence of institutional constraints. This raises the question of how institutions and the political environment impact experimentation and learning. I show how a simple political friction—uncertainty over voter preferences—interacts with political competition and policy uncertainty in a subtle way that, surprisingly, improves the quality of policymaking over time.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference50 articles.
1. Page Scott E. , and Zharinova Natalia . 2006. “Can Electoral Competition Outperform a Social Planner?” University of Michigan. Unpublished manuscript.
2. A Farewell to Alms
3. Leadership and Pandering: A Theory of Executive Policymaking
4. The Benefit of Crisis for Economic Reforms;Drazen;American Economic Review,1993
5. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Cited by
91 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献