Samuel Clarke on Agent Causation, Voluntarism, and Occasionalism

Author:

Sangiacomo Andrea

Abstract

ArgumentThis paper argues that Samuel Clarke's account of agent causation (i) provides a philosophical basis for moderate voluntarism, and (ii) both leads to and benefits from the acceptance of partial occasionalism as a model of causation for material beings. Clarke's account of agent causation entails that for an agent to be properly called an agent (i.e. causally efficacious), it is essential that the agent is free to choose whether to act or not. This freedom is compatible with the existence of conceptually necessary connections. Hence, Clarke can harmonize God's freedom of choosing with the existence of eternal and necessary relations among things. Moreover, in Clarke's account, only intelligent entities can be properly understood as efficacious causes. Beings deprived of intelligence are not agents or efficacious causes at all and their effects are thus the result of the immediate action of some intelligent being operating upon them.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences

Reference92 articles.

1. Deism in Enlightenment England

2. Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon

3. La doctrine médiévale des causes et la théologie de la nature pure (XIIIe-XVIIe siècles);Schmutz;Revue thomiste,2001

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Do you need to know in order to act? The case for a Suárezian legacy in early modern occasionalism;The Southern Journal of Philosophy;2023-04-17

2. Sir Kenelm Digby, the Immortality of the Soul, and Philosophical Theology in Seventeenth-Century England;International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées;2022

3. Occasionalism: Causation and Divine Action in Early Modern Philosophy and Science;Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences;2022

4. The Senses of Touch and Movement and the Argument for Active Powers;HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science;2021-09-01

5. Readers of the first edition of Newton's Principia on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687–1713;Centaurus;2021-03-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3