Abstract
AbstractThis article explores the shift to non-rhoticity in Oldham (UK), using oral history interviews recorded in the 1980s, with speakers born between 1893 and 1929. We first account for the linguistic constraints on /r/ use and explore macro-level social patterns, where the women were more advanced in the change. We investigate this finding further using a modified version of the lectal focusing in interaction method (Sharma & Rampton 2015), tracking two speakers’ variation through the course of an interaction, and providing insight into the social meaning of rhoticity for these speakers. We suggest that, for them, rhoticity may be ideologically linked to tradition and older ways of life, and non-rhoticity may be ideologically linked to modernity and mobility, and the gender split may partly reflect the men and women's differing orientations to these concepts. We also evaluate the effectiveness of applying modern methods, such as LFI analysis, to archival data. (Rhoticity, social meaning, language variation and change, gender, sociophonetics)*
Funder
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Language and Linguistics
Reference46 articles.
1. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4
2. Proceedings of Methods XIII
3. Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R
4. Boston (r): Neighbo(r)s nea(r) and fa(r)
5. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah ; Kendall, Tyler ; Foulkes, Paul ; Watt, Dominic ; Eddie, Jillian ; Harrison, Philip ; & Kavenagh, Colleen (2008). Perception of r-fulness by trained listeners. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 37. Houston, Texas.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献