Author:
Beyers Jan,Braun Caelesta
Abstract
AbstractThe degree to which interest groups gain access to policymakers has often been explained by focusing on the exchange of resources in a dyadic relation between interest groups and policymakers. This article argues that the position an interest group occupies within a coalition and the relations it has outside its coalition substantially affect the likelihood of gaining access to policymakers. Our empirical focus is on the Dutch interest group system for which we examine how coalitions among groups and the network position of interest groups within and between such coalitions shape access. The analysis, based on data collected among 107 Dutch interest groups and 28 policymakers, leads to the conclusion that network positions count differently for elected and non-elected officials, and that network ties that bridge different coalitions add significant explanatory leverage to resource-based explanations of access.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration
Cited by
113 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. TRANSFORMATIONS IN GOVERNANCE;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04
2. Conclusion;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04
3. National Consequences;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04
4. Regional Consequences;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04
5. National Causes;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04