Abstract
Abstract
This chapter analyses the causes of the extent of shared rule at the level of countries. It combines a paired comparison of the USA and Canada with a quantitative analysis of forty-two Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/European Union countries plus Bosnia and Herzegovina. Shared rule is higher in ‘coming-together’ federations with extensive linguistic diversity and extended degrees of de- or non-centralization. The chapter also identifies two resulting tensions: that in ‘staying-together’ federations with high levels of self-rule, calls will inevitably arise for greater shared rule too; and that in systems with already high levels of shared rule, regional influence over state-wide decisions might not always work as intended and/or only to the profit of some regions, for instance those aligned with the state-wide majority or richer ones.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference446 articles.
1. Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers;Abizadeh;American Political Science Review,2021
2. Danielle Smith Didn’t Give Us a Watered-Down Version of Alberta’s Sovereignty Act;Adams,2022
3. Federalism and Regime Change: De/centralization in Pakistan—1956–2020;Adeney;Regional and Federal Studies,2022