Abstract
The characteristically Aristotelian defense of the city's authority over its members is summarized in the statements “every city exists by nature” and “man is by nature a political animal.” These doctrines distinguish Aristotle not only from such of his predecessors as the Sophists and Plato but also from two leading schools of contemporary political thought, liberalism and Marxism. Aspiring to assess the merits of Aristotle's unique approach to the problem of political authority, this paper examines Aristotle's teaching on the relationship between nature and the city. This relationship is shown to be far more complex than is implied in the doctrine that the city is natural. I conclude by wondering why Aristotle addressed the problem of political authority with a doctrine he shows to be merely provisional and why he addressed it with this particular provisional doctrine.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference45 articles.
1. Strauss , City and Man, pp. 41–42
2. Barker , Political Thought, pp. 264–70
3. Plato Protagoras
4. Rational Animal-Political Animal: Nature and Convention in Human Speech and Politics
Cited by
75 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Education and politikon zoōn;Filozofija i drustvo;2022
2. Universal Ethics;Cultural Perspectives on Global Research Epistemology;2021
3. Culture and Ethics;Cultural Perspectives on Global Research Epistemology;2021
4. The Priority of the Good and the Contrapuntal Character of Aristotle’s Politics I;Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought;2020-05-11
5. Del higienismo a la acupuntura urbana. Metáforas médicas y urbanismo excluyente en Bogotá;Territorios;2020-02-04