The Priority of the Good and the Contrapuntal Character of Aristotle’s Politics I
-
Published:2020-05-11
Issue:2
Volume:37
Page:221-244
-
ISSN:0142-257X
-
Container-title:Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Polis
Affiliation:
1. Villanova University Villanova, PA USA
Abstract
Abstract
Politics I has been the subject of a number of textual questions about the relation of the Ethics to the Politics. These textual questions involve us in theoretical questions about the differences between contemporary and ancient conceptions of political rule. Resolving the exegetical challenges can help us clarify the theoretical differences. A fresh approach to the textual challenges reveals that Politics I has a contrapuntal character with two reinforcing movements. One explores why and how despotic conceptions of politics fail using case studies of despotic power: slavery and money-making. Aristotle shows dialectically how this despotic approach to rule undermines the requirements for political life. The other movement explores the character of natural human associations, culminating in the polis. The two movements converge in Aristotle’s claim about the centrality of the human good for political rule. This claim challenges modern social contract theory’s understanding of the differences between despotic and political rule.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,History,Classics