Abstract
AbstractScientific plagiarism is as sui generis as the author function in science. A study of the specificity of scientific plagiarism and the ways in which it diverges from appropriation in other disciplines allows us to question traditional definitions that focus on the copying of published copyrighted materials. The form of plagiarism that is most damaging to scientists does not involve publications, is largely outside the scope of copyright law, and is unlikely to be detected by textual-similarity algorithms. The same features that make this kind of plagiarism difficult to identify and control also provide a powerful window on the unique construction of authorial credit in science, the problems of peer review, and the limitations of plagiarism surveillance technologies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Museology,Anthropology,History,Cultural Studies,Conservation
Reference45 articles.
1. Plagiarism? No, we're just borrowing better English
2. Chinese Researchers Debate Rash of Plagiarism Cases
3. Wikipedia. “Hardy-Weinberg Principle.” ⟨http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy-Weinberg_principle⟩ accessed 8 August 2012.
4. Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science
5. Self-Plagiarism or Fair Use?;Samuelson;Communications of the ACM,1994
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献