Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil

Published:2022-01-11 Issue: Volume: Page:1-32
ISSN:0898-9621
Container-title:Accountability in Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Accountability in Research

Author:

Vasconcelos Sonia M. R.¹^ORCID,Masuda Hatisaburo¹,Sorenson Martha¹^ORCID,Prosdocimi Francisco¹^ORCID,Palácios Marisa²^ORCID,Watanabe Edson³^ORCID,Carlos Pinto José³^ORCID,Lapa e Silva José Roberto⁴^ORCID,Vieyra Adalberto⁵^ORCID,Pinto André⁶,Mena-Chalco Jesús⁷^ORCID,Sant’Ana Mauricio⁸,Roig Miguel⁹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Science Education Program, Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis (IBqM)/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2. Nucleus for Bioethics (NUBEA)/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

3. Institute Alberto Luiz Coimbra for Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering (COPPE)/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

4. Faculty of Medicine University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF)/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro

5. Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho (IBCCF)/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

6. Formerly Brazilian Center for Physics Research (CBPF) (in Memoriam), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

7. Center for Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC)/Federal University of ABC (UFABC), São Paulo, Brazil

8. National Agency for Supplementary Health (ANS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

9. Department of Psychology, St. John’ S University, New York, New York, USA

Funder

Brazilian National Research Council for Scientific and Technological Development

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08989621.2021.2018306

Reference91 articles.

1. AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2011. “Annual Meeting.” Science without Borders. https://www.aaas.org/news/science-without-borders-registration-opens-2011-aaas-annual-meeting-washington-dc

2. Statistical significance—meaningful or not

3. ALLEA (All European Academies). 2017. “The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.” https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf

4. Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases

5. Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Profiling Chinese university students’ understandings of plagiarism through Q methodology;Ethics & Behavior;2024-08-12

2. The plagiarism pandemic: Inspection of academic dishonesty during the COVID-19 outbreak using originality software;Education and Information Technologies;2023-06-21