Abstract
AbstractIn December 2000, a World Indigenous Peoples Forum was held in conjunction with the 24th session of UNESCO's World Heritage Committee in Cairns, Australia. Representatives from Australia, Canada, and New Zealand harnessed the momentum of these events and their location to propose the formation of a new committee, the World Heritage Indigenous Peoples Council of Experts (WHIPCOE). The initiative was taken in response to concerns voiced by indigenous peoples to their lack of involvement in the development and implementation of laws, policies, and plans for the protection of their knowledge, traditions, and cultural values, which apply to their ancestral lands, within or comprising sites now designated as World Heritage properties. This article traces the fate of that proposal and underlines the intransigence of sovereign states during those short-lived discussions. It goes on to suggest alternate routes for indigenous representation and recognition within the World Heritage system.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Museology,Anthropology,History,Cultural Studies,Conservation
Reference64 articles.
1. The UNESCO Regime for the Protection of World Heritage as Prototype of an Autonomy-Gaining International Institution
2. World Heritage and Indigenous rights: Norwegian examples
3. Becoming American or Becoming Indian?
4. United Nations General Assembly. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=A/RES/61/295 (2 October 2007).
5. United Nations General Assembly. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html (10 December 1948).
Cited by
68 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献