World Heritage and human rights

Author:

Gowen Margaret1

Affiliation:

1. School of Archaeology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland

Abstract

This paper describes the protracted nomination to the UNESCO World Heritage (WH) List of the Keang Krachan Forest Complex, Thailand and the issues it exposed. The complex was inscribed in 2021, seven years after it was first nominated, despite ongoing conflict with indigenous Karen hunter-gatherer communities. The nomination was referred back to the state party by the WH Committee in 2015, 2016 and 2019 for reasons related to inconclusive and out-of-date ecological information, and human rights issues associated with the forced resettlement of Karen hill tribe people living within its proposed boundaries. In 2020 the nomination was resubmitted during the 4th mandate of the Thai state party on the WH Committee, and the property was inscribed contrary to a formal recommendation to defer the nomination, and despite repeated communications from the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights to the WH Centre, the Thai government and the WH Committee seeking resolution of community and human rights issues prior to inscription. Decisions that run contrary to the advice of the WH Committee’s three advisory bodies have become an abiding and troubling aspect of the Committee’s decision-making, reflecting a trend in the politicisation of Committee sessions that has increased over more than 20 years, to a point where it now threatens the integrity of the World Heritage system. This paper examines how the state party pursued its WH ambitions and the impacts this had on particular indigenous Karen communities during national designation and nomination to the WH List. It demonstrates the issues that arise due to legacy nature conservation approaches to the management of extensive natural protected areas.

Publisher

Liverpool University Press

Reference90 articles.

1. Bangkok Post 2021a. Karen fear Kaeng Krachan’s World Heritage listing ends their hopes: we don’t know what it means – no one has told us. Bangkok Post 8 October 2021. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2194723.

2. Bangkok Post 2021b. Respect Jai Paen Din villagers’ right to homeland. Bangkok Post 8 February. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/2064223/reStatePartyect-jai-paen-din-villagers-right-to-homeland.

3. Brokington, D 2002. Fortress conservation: the preservation of the Mkomazi game reserve, Tanzania. Oxford: James Currey.

4. Eviction for conservation: a global overview;Brokington D;Conservation and Society,2006

5. Shifting tides of world-making in the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: cospompolitinisms colliding;Brumann C;Ethnic and Racial Studies / Fuer Ethnologische Forsc,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3