Tell us how to engage you! Asking polar stakeholders about their engagement preferences

Author:

Baer Kristina C.ORCID,Latola Kirsi,Scheepstra Annette J. M.

Abstract

AbstractThe changes the polar regions face are too complex to be tackled by single scientific disciplines and in isolation from societal actors. Therefore, the call for polar research projects that engage with stakeholders outside academia increases. The ideal set-up of these projects is envisioned as an inclusive and action-oriented process that brings scientists and stakeholders together to identify pressing issues of societal and scientific relevance and to develop research projects that produce practical outcomes. However, working across disciplines and knowledge systems can be challenging. To better understand stakeholders’ motivation for engaging in polar science projects, to learn what stages of a project they are interested in and what their preferred modes of engagement are, stakeholders were surveyed as part of the EU-funded project EU-PolarNet. The results suggest that while most academic survey participants are eager to participate from problem definition to dissemination of results, most non-academic survey participants preferred interaction at the stages when results were disseminated and used for informed decision-making. The survey results have their limitations, yet they provide a basis for important future approaches to stakeholder engagement in polar research projects. They show that stakeholders prefer to engage in different stages of a research project depending on their specific needs and interests, while also acknowledging that additional support may be required to enable meaningful engagement throughout the research process.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference32 articles.

1. European Commission. (2006). FP7 – Tomorrow’s answers start today. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/pdf/fp7-factsheets_en.pdf

2. Arctic Science Ministerial (AMS). (2016). Joint Statement of Ministers. On the occasion of the first White House Arctic Science Ministerial, Washington, DC, USA. Retrieved September 28, 2016, from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/28/joint-statement-ministers

3. A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?

4. Participatory research. What is the history? Has the purpose changed?;Macaulay;Family Practice,2017

5. 'Participatory interdisciplinarity': Towards the integration of disciplinary diversity with stakeholder engagement for new models of knowledge production

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3