Abstract
AbstractAccording to the burgeoning voter mobilization field experiments literature, impersonal contact has little-to-no effect. A conversation with a computer is, by definition, an impersonal interaction. However, chatbots are form of communication wherein a computer imitates conversations by interacting using natural language. Human-to-chatbot interactions are often perceived as similar to human-to-human interactions. How ubiquitous are chatbots? Just ask Siri, Cortana, Bixby, or Alexa, or ask for help on any e-commerce website (these are each chatbots). A simple voter mobilization treatment reminding users of a political chatbot (Resistbot) to vote and providing information about polling locations and hours increased turnout by 1.8 percentage points in a 2019 election. The results replicate previously unpublished field experiments by Resistbot in 2018 that found smaller but statistically significant increases in turnout.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference40 articles.
1. Putorti, Jason . 2019. Yes, Resistbot Is Effective. Medium. https://resistbot.news/yes-resistbot-is-effective-8e14e72a5ed9.
2. Can Conversing with a Computer Increase Turnout? Mobilization Using Chatbot Communication
3. An Email Won’t Get Me to the Ballot Box. Evidence from a «Get Out the Vote» Experiment in an Italian University Election;Ladini;Comunicazione politica,2019
4. Heeding the Call: The Effect of Targeted Two-Round Phone Banks on Voter Turnout
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献