Abstract
In one of the most disputed passages of Greek literature Plato in the Republic, 7. 528e–530c prescribes astronomy as the fourth study in the education of the Guardians. But what sort of astronomy? According to one school of thought it is a purely speculative study of bodies in motion having no relation to the celestial objects that we see. While this interpretation has rejoiced the hearts of Plato's detractors, who regard him as an obstacle to the progress of science, it has dismayed his admirers. Another school of thought holds that what Plato meant was that astronomers must get to know the real motions of the heavenly bodies as opposed to their apparent motions as seen by us on earth. The opposed interpretations may be set out in the following representative citations from Sir Thomas Heath and John Burnet.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Classics
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Kinematic Modelling in Greek Astronomy: The Design of Heavenly Mechanisms;Explorations in the History and Heritage of Machines and Mechanisms;2022
2. Platonic Astronomy and the Development of Ancient Sphairopoiia;Rhizomata;2016-01-15
3. Copernicus and the Aristotelian Tradition;HIST SCI MED LIBR;2010-01-25
4. References;Plato's Introduction of Forms;2001-01-01
5. Conclusion;Plato's Introduction of Forms;2001-01-01