Abstract
The contrast typically made between utilitarianism and virtue theory is overdrawn. Utilitarianism is a universal emulator: it implies that we should lie, cheat, steal, even appropriate Aristotle, when that is what brings about the best outcomes. In some cases and in some worlds it is best for us to focus as precisely as possible on individual acts. In other cases and worlds it is best for us to be concerned with character traits. Global environmental change leads to concerns about character because the best results will be produced by generally uncoupling my behavior from that of others. Thus, in this case and in this world, utilitarians should be virtue theorists.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Reference13 articles.
1. John Doris , ‘Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics’, NOUS 32 (1998)
2. Susan Wolf , ‘Moral Saints’, Journal of Philosophy 79 (1982), esp. p. 422
3. Charles A. S. Hall , Gil Pontius R. Jr , Lisa Coleman and Jae-Young Ko , ‘The Environmental Consequences of Having a Baby in the United States’, Wild Earth 5 (1995)
4. Callicott J. Baird , ‘Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair’, Environmental Ethics 2 (1980)
5. Rosalind Hursthouse , On Virtue Ethics (Oxford, 1999)
Cited by
201 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Notes;Very Practical Ethics;2024-08-09
2. Forgiveness;Very Practical Ethics;2024-08-09
3. Giving Aid;Very Practical Ethics;2024-08-09
4. Very Practical Ethics;2024-08-09
5. Conclusion;Very Practical Ethics;2024-08-09