Abstract
With very advanced technology, a very large population of people living happy lives could be sustained in the accessible region of the universe. For every year that development of such technologies and colonization of the universe is delayed, there is therefore a corresponding opportunity cost: a potential good, lives worth living, is not being realized. Given some plausible assumptions, this cost is extremely large. However, the lesson for standard utilitarians is not that we ought to maximize the pace of technological development, but rather that we ought to maximize its safety, i.e. the probability that colonization will eventually occur. This goal has such high utility that standard utilitarians ought to focus all their efforts on it. Utilitarians of a ‘person-affecting’ stripe should accept a modified version of this conclusion. Some mixed ethical views, which combine utilitarian considerations with other criteria, will also be committed to a similar bottom line.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Reference12 articles.
1. Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards;Bostrom;Journal of Evolution and Technology,2002
Cited by
90 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Risk and Harm;Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces;2023-07-19
2. On two arguments for fanaticism;Noûs;2023-06-02
3. The future of intelligence in the Universe: a call for humility;International Journal of Astrobiology;2023-06-01
4. The epistemic challenge to longtermism;Synthese;2023-05-31
5. Justifying the Precautionary Principle as a political principle;Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics;2023-05-11