Abstract
AbstractThis paper is a sequel to Beall (2011), in which I both give and discuss the philosophical import of a ‘classical collapse’ result for the propositional (multiple-conclusion) logic LP+. Feedback on such ideas prompted a spelling out of the first-order case. My aim in this paper is to do just that: namely, explicitly record the first-order result(s), including the collapse results for K3+and FDE+.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Logic,Philosophy,Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Reference27 articles.
1. Revising up: Strengthening classical logic in the face of paradox;Ripley;Philosophers’ Imprint,2013
2. Shrieking against gluts: the solution to the 'just true' problem
3. MULTIPLE-CONCLUSION LP AND DEFAULT CLASSICALITY
4. Ripley D . (2013a). Naïve set theory and non-transitive logic. To appear.
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献