The Development of Consensus-Based Descriptors for Low-Acuity Emergency Medical Services Cases for the South African Setting

Author:

Binks FaisalORCID,Wallis Lee AlanORCID,Stassen WillemORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction:Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are designed to respond to and manage patients experiencing life-threatening emergencies; however, not all emergency calls are necessarily emergent and of high acuity. Emergency responses to low-acuity patients affect not only EMS, but other areas of the health care system. However, definitions of low-acuity calls are vague and subjective; therefore, it was necessary to provide a clear description of the low-acuity patient in EMS.Aim:The goal of this study was to develop descriptors for “low-acuity EMS patients” through expert consensus within the EMS environment.Methods:A Modified Delphi survey was used to develop call-out categories and descriptors of low acuity through expert opinion of practitioners within EMS. Purposive, snowball sampling was used to recruit 60 participants, of which 29 completed all three rounds. An online survey tool was used and offered both binary and free-text options to participants. Consensus of 75% was accepted on the binary options while free text offered further proposals for consideration during the survey.Results:On completion of round two, consensus was obtained on 45% (70/155) of the descriptors, and a further 30% (46/155) consensus was obtained in round three. Experts felt that respiratory distress, unconsciousness, chest pain, and severe hemorrhage cannot be considered low acuity. For other emergency response categories, specific descriptors were offered to denote a case as low acuity.Conclusion:Descriptors of low acuity in EMS are provided in both medical and trauma cases. These descriptors may not only assist in the reduction of unnecessary response and transport of patients, but also assist in identifying the most appropriate response of EMS resources to call-outs. Further development and validation are required of these descriptors in order to improve accuracy and effectiveness within the EMS dispatch environment.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Emergency,Emergency Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. 24. Oh, K. Forecasting through hierarchical Delphi. 1974. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=osu148698532753885&disposition=inline. Accessed July 9, 2020.

2. Can emergency medical dispatch systems safely reduce first-responder call volume?;Cone;Prehosp Emerg Care.,2008

3. 22. Annual Reports - KZN Department of Health. http://www.kznhealth.gov.za/reports.htm. Accessed July 9, 2020.

4. Ability of the medical priority dispatch system protocol to predict the acuity of ‘unknown problem’ dispatch response levels;Clawson;Prehosp Emerg Care.,2008

5. Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology?;Ludwig;J Ext.,1997

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3