Author:
Taylor Phillip,Barakat Lina,Miles Simon,Griffiths Nathan
Abstract
AbstractTrust and reputation allow agents to make informed decisions about potential interactions. Trust in an agent is derived from direct experience with that agent, while reputation is determined by the experiences reported by other witness agents with potentially differing viewpoints. These experiences are typically aggregated in a trust and reputation model, of which there are several types that focus on different aspects. Such aspects include handling subjective perspectives of witnesses, dishonesty, or assessing the reputation of new agents. In this paper, we distil reputation systems into their fundamental aspects, discussing first how trust and reputation information is represented and second how it is disseminated among agents. Based on these discussions, a unifying abstraction is presented for trust and reputation systems, which is demonstrated by instantiating it with a broad range of reputation systems found in the literature. The abstraction is then instantiated to combine the range of capabilities of existing reputation systems in the Machine Learning Reputation System, which is evaluated using a marketplace simulation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Software
Reference46 articles.
1. Muller T. , Liu Y. & Zhang J. 2015. The fallacy of endogenous discounting of trust recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 563–572.
2. Burnett C. , Norman T. J. & Sycara K. 2010. Bootstrapping trust evaluations through stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 241–248.
3. Taylor P. , Griffiths N. , Barakat L. & Miles S. 2017a. Stereotype reputation with limited observability. In 19th International Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies.
4. Whitby A. , Jøsang A. & Indulska J. 2004. Filtering out unfair ratings in Bayesian reputation systems. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies, 6, 106–117.
5. POYRAZ: CONTEXT-AWARE SERVICE SELECTION UNDER DECEPTION
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献