Abstract
ABSTRACTPoliticians invest a lot of energy into managing their image, with the hope that the public views them favorably. In sharing details about themselves, elected officials want to be seen as people, not just as politicians. Are these efforts successful? I explore this question using an experiment inspired by a column in the celebrity entertainment magazine Us Weekly. I find that politicians who share nonpolitical autobiographical details about themselves secure warmer evaluations from the public. Reading this type of personalizing information also can contribute to ratings of elected officials that are less polarized by partisanship. While personalizing information boosts favorability toward politicians across party lines, members of the opposing party are particularly likely to report warmer affect toward the politician about whom they read. This suggests that this type of soft news coverage has the potential to depolarize partisan evaluations of politicians.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference24 articles.
1. Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit
2. The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments
3. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
4. The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Audience Attitude Change During the 2004 Party Conventions
5. Lewis, Jeffrey B. , Poole, Keith , Rosenthal, Howard , Boche, Adam , Rudkin, Aaron , and Sonnet, Luke . 2021. Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. www.voteview.com.