Author:
Ainsley A. E.,Dyke G. V.,Jenkyn J. F.
Abstract
SUMMARYResults obtained from the plots of a field experiment may be subject to’ representational errors'; that is, they may not exactly reproduce the results that would be expected if the same treatments were applied to whole fields. In particular, the treatment applied to one particular plot often has the potential to affect the adjacent plots; such an effect may be positive or negative according to circumstances, and its magnitude cannot easily be estimated. This paper shows, on theoretical grounds and by simulations, that nearest-neighbour (NN) analysis cannot be relied upon to mitigate the effects of such inter-plot interference, even when the residual variance of the NN analysis is substantially, and by normal criteria significantly, smaller than that of conventional (randomized block) analysis. In certain circumstances, NN analysis of data affected by interference produces greater average bias in estimated treatment differences than conventional analysis.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference30 articles.
1. Mildew reinfection in adjacent and separated plots of sprayed barley
2. Analysis of field experiments by least squares smoothing;Green;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series,1985
3. Serial designs balanced for effects of neighbours on both sides
4. Interference between plots in experiments with plant pathogens;Jenkyn;Aspects of Applied Biology,1985
5. Nearest neighbour models in the analysis of field experiments;Bartlett;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series,1978
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献