1. Dr Hudson contends that this list was actually used, and that similar questions were asked of Lollards in other places in England. I want to thank Dr Thomas Goodman of the University of Miami for this reference. Cf. also the ‘Interrogationes Wyclifitis et Husitis proponendae’ of Martin V, nos 16, 17: ‘16. Item, utrum credat, quod post consecrationem sacerdotis in sacramento altaris sub velamento panis et vini non sit panis materialis et vinum materiale, sed idem per omnia Christus, qui fuit in cruce passus et sedet ad dexteram Patris. 17. Item, utrum credat et asserat, quod facta consecratione per sacerdotem, sub sola specie panis tantum, et praeter speciem vini, sit vera caro Christi et sanguis et anima et deitas et totus Christus, ac idem corpus absolute et sub unaqualibet illarum specierum singulariter’: Denzinger, Enchiridion, nos 1256–7.
2. Josef Wohlmuth , Realpriisenz und Transsubstantiation im Konzil von Trient, Frankfurt 1975.
3. Jorissen , Entfaltung, 56.
4. Plotnick , Hervaeus Natalis, 57, and Martin , ‘Eucharistic treatise’.
5. Kenneth Plotnick , Hervaeus Natalis, O.P. and the controversies over the real presence and transubstantiation, Munich 1970, esp. pp. 15–19.