Author:
PRUSA THOMAS J.,VERMULST EDWIN
Abstract
AbstractIn 2007, the United States reversed its long-standing policy prohibiting the simultaneous imposition of anti-dumping duties (ADDs) and countervailing duties (CVDs) against nonmarket economies. Subsequently, the United States has imposed concurrent ADDs and CVDs in numerous cases against China. China challenged a number of aspects of the US practice, most notably the double-remedies issue, which occurs when a domestic subsidy is offset by both an ADD and CVD. The Appellate Body (AB) correctly ruled that double remedies are inconsistent with the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and that the burden was on the investigating authorities to ensure that double remedies were not being imposed; however, the AB largely limited its discussion to measurement concerns, an approach that may have inadvertently opened the door to future double-remedies disputes involving other methods for computing normal value. Two other issues that are likely to have significant long-term ramifications are (i) the scope of the term ‘public body’ and (ii) the appropriate use of out-of-country benchmarks. On both issues, we believe the AB's conclusions and analysis were correct.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Reference15 articles.
1. The Offsetting Duty Norm and the Simultaneous Application of Countervailing and Antidumping Duties
2. International Comparisons of Pricing-to-Market Behavior;Knetter;The American Economic Review,1993
3. Exchange Rate Pass-Through When Market Share Matters;Froot;The American Economic Review,1989
4. The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle;Rogoff;Journal of Economic Literature,1996
5. Concurrent trade defense investigations in the EU, the EU's new anti-subsidy practice against China, and the future of both
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献