Author:
Ruse Michael,Wilson Edward O.
Abstract
(1) For much of this century, moral philosophy has been constrained by the supposed absolute gap between is and ought, and the consequent belief that the facts of life cannot of themselves yield an ethical blueprint for future action. For this reason, ethics has sustained an eerie existence largely apart from science. Its most respected interpreters still believe that reasoning about right and wrong can be successful without a knowledge of the brain, the human organ where all the decisions about right and wrong are made. Ethical premises are typically treated in the manner of mathematical propositions: directives supposedly independent of human evolution, with a claim to ideal, eternal truth.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
203 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Varieties of Darwinism: Explanation, Logic, and Worldview;The Quarterly Review of Biology;2024-06-01
2. Compendium;The Moral Universe;2024-05-30
3. Envoi;The Moral Universe;2024-05-30
4. Deep Normativity;The Moral Universe;2024-05-30
5. The Principle of Befittingness;The Moral Universe;2024-05-30