Abstract
SUMMARY:The author reviews the arguments for and against the four etiologic hypotheses in Friedreich’s disease that have been proposed since 1974: the “pyruvate hypothesis”, the “lipidmembrane hypothesis”, the “energy-defect hypothesis” and finally the “taurine hypothesis”. While none of these hypotheses are mutually exclusive, the author shows that all of these mechanisms play some role in the pathophysiology of the symptoms, but that only the “taurine hypothesis” appears to be compatible with all the known facts and the biochemical abnormalities reported. The author proposes that ataurine retention defect(possibly due to a block in the high affinity-low capacity transport of taurine – The TH System) is a primary event in Friedreich’s disease. Whether it istheprimary genetic event still has to be determined.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Clinical Neurology,Neurology,General Medicine
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献