Abstract
During the nineteenth century, U.S. manufacturers shifted away from the “hand labor” mode of production, characteristic of artisan shops, to “machine labor,” which was increasingly concentrated in steam-powered factories. This transition fundamentally changed production tasks, jobs, and job requirements. This paper uses digitized data on these two production modes from an 1899 U.S. Commissioner of Labor report to estimate the frequency and impact of the use of inanimate power on production operation times. About half of production operations were mechanized; the use of inanimate power raised productivity, accounting for about one-quarter to one-third of the overall productivity advantage of machine labor. However, additional factors, such as the increased division of labor and adoption of high-volume production, also played quantitatively important roles in raising productivity in machine production versus by hand.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics,History
Reference38 articles.
1. Hand and Machine Labor;Wright;Gunton’s Magazine,1900
2. Atack, Jeremy , Margo, Robert A. , and Rhode, Paul W. . “The Division of Labor and Economies of Scale in Late Nineteenth Century American Manufacturing.” Unpublished Working Paper, 2017.
3. Willis, Robert . Principles of Mechanism, Designed for the Use of Students in the Universities and for Engineering Students Generally. London and Cambridge: J. E. Parker and J. & J. J. Deighton, 1841.
4. A General-Purpose Technology at Work: The Corliss Steam Engine in the Late-Nineteenth-Century United States
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献