Abstract
This article analyzes rural-urban migration in Great Britain in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Using a new dataset of 28,000 individuals matched between the 1851 and 1881 population censuses, I examine the selection process and treatment effect of migration, controlling for the endogeneity of the migration decision. I find that urban migrants were positively selected—the best of the rural labor pool—and that the economic benefits of migration were substantial. Migrants responded to market signals, and labor markets were largely efficient; however, not all gains from migration were exploited, potentially indicating some degree of inefficiency.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics,History
Reference43 articles.
1. Higgs Edward 1986 A Clearer Sense of the Census.London:HMSO,
2. Williamson Jeffrey G. 1990 Coping with City Growth during the British Industrial Revolution.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,
3. Baines Dudley 1994“Population, Migration and Regional Development, 1870–1939.”In The Economic History of Britain Since 1700,vol 2,edited by R. Floud and D. McCloskey ,29–61 Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,
4. Royle Stephen A. 1977“Social Stratification from Early Census Returns: A New Approach.”AREA 9: 215–19.
5. Southall Humphrey , and David M. Gilbert .1996“A Good Time to Wed?: Marriage and Economic Distress in England and Wales, 1839 to 1914.”Economic History Review 49,no. 1: 35–57.
Cited by
62 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献