Abstract
The introduction of mass production transformed many skilled tasks into repetitive and monotonous jobs. In industries such as automobiles, the workforce remained predominantly male despite contemporary assessments that women could efficiently do many of these jobs. This article explores why. It is argued that employers such as Ford concluded that the conversion of labor time into effort would be more difficult in a mixed-gender workforce. The paper shows how Ford developed a fraternalist labor strategy, a men's club, whose objective was to accommodate men to monotony and maximize labor productivity.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics,History
Reference82 articles.
1. Did Henry Ford Pay Efficiency Wages?;Raff;Journal of Labor Economics,1987
2. Comments on a Paper Titled ‘Works Organization,’;Reeves;Proceedings, Institute of Automobile Engineers,1916
3. 'From Behind the Women's Petticoats': The English Factory Act of 1874 as a Cultural Production
Cited by
62 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献