Abstract
In the academic literature, Hungary and Poland are often cited as paradigmatic cases of democratic backsliding. However, as the backsliding narrative gained traction, the term has been applied to the rest of the post-communist region, including the Czech Republic and Slovakia. We suggest that this diagnosis is in part based on conceptual stretching, and set out to rescue the concept as an analytical tool. We then assess the extent of backsliding in the four Visegrád countries, explaining backsliding (and the relative lack of it) in terms of motive, opportunity, and the strength or weakness of opposing or constraining forces. We conclude that the situation is not as desperate as some commentators would have it: democratic backsliding in Hungary and Poland was contingent on a few exceptional factors, and EU leaders therefore need not be paralysed by the fear of contagion when they contemplate forceful action against backsliding member states.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference124 articles.
1. Pech, Laurent , and Wachowiec, Patryk . 2020. “1460 Days Later: Rule of Law in Poland R.I.P. (Part I).” Verfassungsblog.de (https://verfassungsblog.de/1460-days-later-rule-of-law-in-poland-r-i-p-part-i/).
2. Januš, , Jan. 2019. “Gerloch ústavním soudcem nebude. Podpořilo ho jen 19 senátorů.” Info.cz, March 20. (https://www.info.cz/pravo/gerloch-ustavnim-soudcem-nebude-podporilo-ho-jen-19-senatoru-40946.html).
3. Nations in Transit . (Various). “Country Reports.” Washington, DC: Freedom House.
4. The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献