Abstract
Industrial robots have different capabilities and specifications according to the required applications. It is becoming difficult to select a suitable robot for specific applications and requirements due to the availability of several types with different specifications of robots in the market. Best-worst method is a useful, highly consistent and reliable method to derive weights of criteria and it is worthy to integrate it with the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method that is more applicable and needs fewer number of calculations as compared to other methods. An example is presented to show the validity and usability of the proposed methodology. Comparison of ranking results matches with the well-known distance-based approach, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution and VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) methods showing the robustness of the best-worst EDAS hybrid method. Sensitivity analysis performed using eighty to one ratio shows that the proposed hybrid MCDM methodology is more stable and reliable.
Funder
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference70 articles.
1. Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using diagraph and matrix methods;RV Rao;Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2006
2. Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods;P Chatterjee;Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2010
3. A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection;VM Athawale;International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations,2011
4. A novel approach of robot selection with the help of observed and theoretical values for a given industrial application;ESRR Kumar;International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current research,2018
5. A Model for Evaluating Alternative Robot Systems Under Uncertainty;K Knott;International Journal of Production Research,1982
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献