Abstract
Restoring arm and hand function has been indicated by individuals with tetraplegia as one of the most important factors for regaining independence. The overall goal of our research is to develop assistive technologies that allow individuals with tetraplegia to control functional reaching movements. This study served as an initial step toward our overall goal by assessing the feasibility of using eye movements to control the motion of an effector in an experimental environment. We aimed to understand how additional motor requirements placed on the eyes affected eye-hand coordination during functional reaching. We were particularly interested in how eye fixation error was affected when the sensory and motor functions of the eyes were entangled due to the additional motor responsibility. We recorded participants’ eye and hand movements while they reached for targets on a monitor. We presented a cursor at the participant’s point of gaze position which can be thought of as being similar to the control of an assistive robot arm. To measure eye fixation error, we used an offline filter to extract eye fixations from the raw eye movement data. We compared the fixations to the locations of the targets presented on the monitor. The results show that not only are humans able to use eye movements to direct the cursor to a desired location (1.04 ± 0.15 cm), but they can do so with error similar to that of the hand (0.84 ± 0.05 cm). In other words, despite the additional motor responsibility placed on the eyes during direct eye-movement control of an effector, the ability to coordinate functional reaching movements was unaffected. The outcomes of this study support the efficacy of using the eyes as a direct command input for controlling movement.
Funder
Ohio Department of Higher Education
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference44 articles.
1. Center NSCIS, et al. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center Annual Statistical Report. Birmingham, AL, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 2009.
2. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population;KD Anderson;Journal of neurotrauma,2004
3. Functional assessment and performance evaluation for assistive robotic manipulators: Literature review;CS Chung;The journal of spinal cord medicine,2013
4. Robotic assistants in personal care: A scoping review;A Bilyea;Medical engineering & physics,2017
5. Impacts of robotic arm use on individuals with upper extremity disabilities: A scoping review;M Beaudoin;Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy,2018