Abstract
Background
Social and behavioural drivers of inappropriate antibiotic use contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Recent reports indicate the Australian community consumes more than twice the defined daily doses (DDD) of antibiotics per 1000 population than in Sweden, and about 20% more than in the United Kingdom (UK). We compare measures of public knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) surrounding AMR in Australia, the UK and Sweden against the policy approaches taken in these settings to address inappropriate antibiotic use.
Methods
National antimicrobial stewardship policies in Australia, Sweden, and the UK were reviewed, supplemented by empirical studies of their effectiveness. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL databases for primary studies of the general public’s KAP around antibiotic use and AMR in each setting (January 1 2011 until July 30 2021). Where feasible, we meta-analysed data on the proportion of participants agreeing with identical or very similar survey questions, using a random effects model.
Results
Policies in Sweden enact tighter control of community antibiotic use; reducing antibiotic use through public awareness raising is not a priority. Policies in the UK and Australia are more reliant on practitioner and public education to encourage appropriate antibiotic use. 26 KAP were included in the review and 16 were meta-analysable. KAP respondents in Australia and the UK are consistently more likely to report beliefs and behaviours that are not aligned with appropriate antibiotic use, compared to participants in similar studies conducted in Sweden.
Conclusions
Interactions between public knowledge, attitudes and their impacts on behaviours surrounding community use of antibiotics are complex and contingent. Despite a greater focus on raising public awareness in Australia and the UK, neither antibiotic consumption nor community knowledge and attitudes are changing significantly. Clearly public education campaigns can contribute to mitigating AMR. However, the relative success of policy approaches taken in Sweden suggests that practice level interventions may also be required to activate prescribers and the communities they serve to make substantive reductions in inappropriate antibiotic use.
Funder
University of Wollongong Global Challenges Program
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference99 articles.
1. The evolving response to antibiotic resistance (1945–2018).;SH Podolsky;Palgrave communications.,2018
2. Tackling the threat of antimicrobial resistance: from policy to sustainable action.;LJ Shallcross;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.,2015
3. Current accounts of antimicrobial resistance: stabilisation, individualisation and antibiotics as infrastructure.;CI Chandler;Palgrave communications,2019
4. Antimicrobial resistance as a problem of values? Views from three continents.;A Broom;Critical Public Health,2020
5. Exploring models for an international legal agreement on the global antimicrobial commons: lessons from climate agreements.;SR Van Katwyk;Health Care Analysis,2020
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献