Abstract
Background
In June 2016, Chile implemented the Law of Food Labelling and Advertising, which included a mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on food and beverages high in added sugar, saturated fat, sodium or energy density, restrictions on child-directed marketing and on the promotion and sales of these products in schools. The regulation does not include taxes although Chile had implemented a tiered tax on SSBs two years before this law was implemented. Therefore, the objective of the study was to simulate the impact of taxing food and beverages based on the cutoff’s points for warning labels on purchases and revenues.
Methods
We derived price elasticities using the linear approximation of the almost ideal demand system for six groups of labeled food and beverages (with a warning label based on the regulation) and unlabeled (with no warning label): 1) unlabeled beverages, 2) labeled beverages, 3) unlabeled cereal based products, 4) labeled cereal based products, 5) labeled meat and fish and 6) labeled sweet snacks and desserts. The study used data on household food beverage purchases from the Kantar WorldPanel Chile and Euromonitor sales to adjust the Kantar elasticity results to the national average. We estimated revenues under three tax scenarios for all labeled food and beverages: 10%, 20%, 30% of the final price excluding taxes.
Results
Except for labeled fish and meat, all food and beverage groups were price elastic. After accounting for a reduction in consumption after the taxes, economic and population growth, revenues for all groups could reach between 457 million USD to 1.3 billion USD. These results based on the much larger tax base of these labeled “high in added sugar, salt or saturated fat or energy density” foods and beverages is much larger.
Conclusion
This fiscal package could be implemented in countries with warning labels to enhance health and welfare. The Chilean warning label front-of-the-package system provides an important guide for countries considering policies to reduce diet-related non communicable diseases, including obesity. The fiscal policy impact alone, as shown here for Chile, will be highly impactful in reducing ultra-processed food intake and generating revenues.
Funder
Bloomberg Philanthropies
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference53 articles.
1. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study;MA Colchero;BMJ,2016
2. United Nations Children’s Fund. Implementing Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: An overview of current approaches and the potential benefits for children2019:[19 p.].
3. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: Systematic review and meta-analysis;AM Teng;Obesity Reviews,2019
4. First-year evaluation of Mexico’s tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: an observational study;C Batis;PLOS Medicine,2016
5. WHO Expert Committee. Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases: technical meeting report, -6 May 2015, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.