Author:
Jindarattanaporn Nongnuch,Phulkerd Sirinya,Chamratrithirong Aphichat,Soottipong Gray Rossarin,Pattaravanich Umaporn,Loyfah Nutnicha,Thapsuwan Sasinee,Thongcharoenchupong Natjera
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Food taxation and food marketing policy are very cost-effectiveness to improve healthy diets among children. The objective of this study was to investigate the socio-demographic characteristics of Thais and attitude towards on policy unhealthy food marketing restriction and sodium taxation which influence high fat, sodium, and sugar (FHSS) food eating.
Methods
The data were obtained from the 2021 Health Behavior of Population Survey, four-stage sampling method of the Thai people, aged 15 years and above, using a offline survey application-assisted face-to-face interview. Logistic Regression were used to analyze the explanatory variables on agreement and HFSS food intake.
Results
Almost half (48.4%) of samples disagreed with sodium taxation, and 42.7% of the samples disagreed with food marketing restriction. Most (99.6%) of Thai respondents consumed HFSS food, including sugar sweetened beverages (SSB). Gender, age, education, income, BMI, and health status were associated with agreement with food marketing restriction policy and sodium taxation policy. There is no association between agreement with policy on sodium taxation and food marketing and HFSS food consumption.
Conclusion
Nearly half of Thais indicated that they disagreed with policy on food marketing restriction and sodium taxation. Therefore, understanding and awareness of the two policies among Thais should be further investigated in order to develop better policy communication for increased public understanding and engagement.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference66 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Obesity Geneva: World Health Organization.; 2021 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/6-facts-on-obesity.
2. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017., et al. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1923–94.
3. Al-Jawaldeh A, Abbass MMS. Unhealthy Dietary habits and obesity: the major risk factors beyond non-communicable diseases in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Front Nutr. 2022;9:817808.
4. Shi Z, Papier K, Yiengprugsawan V, Kelly M, Seubsman S-a, Sleigh AC. Dietary patterns associated with hypertension risk among adults in Thailand: 8-year findings from the Thai Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(2):307–13.
5. Hartman-Petrycka M, Witkoś J, Lebiedowska A, Błońska-Fajfrowska B. Who likes unhealthy food with a strong Flavour? Influence of sex, Age, Body Mass Index, Smoking and olfactory efficiency on junk food preferences. Nutrients. 2022;14:19.