Abstract
This paper presents a systematic study of the effects of hyperspectral pixel dimensionality reduction on the pixel classification task. We use five dimensionality reduction methods—PCA, KPCA, ICA, AE, and DAE—to compress 301-dimensional hyperspectral pixels. Compressed pixels are subsequently used to perform pixel classifications. Pixel classification accuracies together with compression method, compression rates, and reconstruction errors provide a new lens to study the suitability of a compression method for the task of pixel classification. We use three high-resolution hyperspectral image datasets, representing three common landscape types (i.e. urban, transitional suburban, and forests) collected by the Remote Sensing and Spatial Ecosystem Modeling laboratory of the University of Toronto. We found that PCA, KPCA, and ICA post greater signal reconstruction capability; however, when compression rates are more than 90% these methods show lower classification scores. AE and DAE methods post better classification accuracy at 95% compression rate, however their performance drops as compression rate approaches 97%. Our results suggest that both the compression method and the compression rate are important considerations when designing a hyperspectral pixel classification pipeline.
Funder
Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference46 articles.
1. Advances in Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: A Comprehensive Overview of the State of the Art;P Ghamisi;IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine,2017
2. Recent Advances of Hyperspectral Imaging Technology and Applications in Agriculture;B Lu;Remote Sensing,2020
3. Band selection for hyperspectral image classification using mutual information;B Guo;IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters,2006
4. Du H, Qi H, Wang X, Ramanath R, Snyder WE. Band selection using independent component analysis for hyperspectral image processing. In: 32nd Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE; 2003. p. 93–98.
5. A comparison of PCA, KPCA and ICA for dimensionality reduction in support vector machine;L Cao;Neurocomputing,2003
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献