Abstract
The prevalence of health myths is increasing with the rise of Internet use. Left unaddressed, online falsehoods can lead to harmful behaviours. In times of crisis, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, the circulation of many myths is exacerbated, often to varying degrees among different cultures. Singapore is a multicultural hub in Asia with Western and Asian influences. Although several studies have examined health myths from a Western or Eastern perspective, little research has investigated online health falsehoods in a population that is culturally exposed to both. Furthermore, most studies examined myths cross-sectionally instead of capturing trends in myth prevalence over time, particularly during crisis situations. Given these literature gaps, we investigated popular myths surrounding the recent COVID-19 pandemic within the multicultural setting of Singapore, by examining its general population. We further examined changes in myth beliefs over the two-year period during the pandemic, and population demographic differences in myth beliefs. Using randomised sampling, two online surveys of nationally representative samples of adults (aged 21–70 years) residing in Singapore were conducted, the first between October 2020 and February 2021 (N = 949), and the second between March and April 2022 (N = 1084). Results showed that 12.7% to 57.5% of the population were unable to identify various myths, such as COVID-19 was manmade, and that three of these myths persisted significantly over time (increases ranging from 3.9% to 9.8%). However, belief in myths varied across population demographics, with ethnic minorities (Indians and Malays), females, young adults and those with lower education levels being more susceptible to myths than their counterparts (p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that current debunking efforts are insufficient to effectively counter misinformation beliefs during health crises. Instead, a post-COVID-19 landscape will require targeted approaches aimed at vulnerable population sub-groups, that also focus on the erroneous beliefs with long staying power.
Funder
National Medical Research Council
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference93 articles.
1. Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication.;SH Kessler;J Public Health (Berl).,2022
2. Jorgensen TJ. The Conversation. 2016 [cited 2022 Sep 2]. When “energy” drinks actually contained radioactive energy. Available from: https://theconversation.com/when-energy-drinks-actually-contained-radioactive-energy-67976.
3. Quick J, Larson H. Time. 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 6]. The vaccine-autism myth started 20 years ago. Here’s why it endures today. Available from: https://time.com/5175704/andrew-wakefield-vaccine-autism/
4. Petrosyan A. Statista. 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 30]. Internet and social media users in the world 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
5. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media.;Y Wang;Soc Sci Med.,2019