Mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking: Level of understanding and implementation in their professional practices

Author:

Aldahmash Abdulwali H.ORCID,Alshalhoub Samar Ab.,Naji Majed A.

Abstract

Mathematics teachers must be able to engage in self-reflection and think constructively about their professional activities to instruct students effectively. This is also important for students’ ability to solve problems in class, as well as the challenges facing them and their societies in the future. This study aimed to examine in-service math teachers’ reflective thinking skills in the context of how they are applied to their understanding of their teaching practices. The sample included 322 mathematics teachers, who responded to a questionnaire designed to elucidate how they were thinking reflectively about their teaching practice. The findings revealed that the teachers’ practices concerning all the themes of reflective thinking addressed by the questionnaire, especially their ability to self-assess, fluctuated around the intermediate, and advanced levels. The implications of our findings are discussed in terms of extensive and continuous professional development centered on supporting ongoing growth in the reflective thinking skills of in-service math teachers.

Funder

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference52 articles.

1. Science teachers’ reflective practices: Perspectives and attitudes;A Aldahmash;International Journal of Educational Sciences,2020

2. Secondary School Science Teachers’ Views about Their Reflective Practices;A. Aldahmash;Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,2017

3. Student Teachers’ Development of Reflective Practice concerning Teaching Philosophy and Peer Observations;A. M. Almusharraf;Arab World English Journal,2020

4. Student-Teacher’s Reflective Thinking and Teaching Practice: How Reflective are They?.;E. Wahyuni

5. From stories—via arguments, scenarios, and cases—to probabilities (Commentary);F. Zenker;Topics in Cognitive Science,2019

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3