Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays

Author:

Bachman Christine M.ORCID,Grant Benjamin D.,Anderson Caitlin E.,Alonzo Luis F.,Garing Spencer,Byrnes Sam A.,Rivera Rafael,Burkot Stephen,Ball Alexey,Stafford James W.,Wang WenboORCID,Banik Dipayan,Keller Matthew D.,Cate David M.ORCID,Nichols Kevin P.,Weigl Bernhard H.,Dewan Puneet

Abstract

Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce.

Funder

Global Health Labs, Inc.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference21 articles.

1. Tracking—Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. [cited 6 May 2021]. Available: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data

2. Quantifying the potential value of antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19: a modelling analysis;S Ricks;BMC Medicine,2021

3. Comparative cost-effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies in the USA: a modelling study;Z Du;The Lancet Public Health,2021

4. Molecular diagnostic technologies for COVID-19: Limitations and challenges;A Afzal;Journal of Advanced Research,2020

5. Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening;DB Larremore;Science Advances,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3