Data management and sharing: Practices and perceptions of psychology researchers

Author:

Borghi John A.ORCID,Van Gulick Ana E.

Abstract

Research data is increasingly viewed as an important scholarly output. While a growing body of studies have investigated researcher practices and perceptions related to data sharing, information about data-related practices throughout the research process (including data collection and analysis) remains largely anecdotal. Building on our previous study of data practices in neuroimaging research, we conducted a survey of data management practices in the field of psychology. Our survey included questions about the type(s) of data collected, the tools used for data analysis, practices related to data organization, maintaining documentation, backup procedures, and long-term archiving of research materials. Our results demonstrate the complexity of managing and sharing data in psychology. Data is collected in multifarious forms from human participants, analyzed using a range of software tools, and archived in formats that may become obsolete. As individuals, our participants demonstrated relatively good data management practices, however they also indicated that there was little standardization within their research group. Participants generally indicated that they were willing to change their current practices in light of new technologies, opportunities, or requirements.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference59 articles.

1. Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—Or Vice Versa;TD Sterling;J Am Stat Assoc,1959

2. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results;R Rosenthal;Psychol Bull,1979

3. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling;LK John;Psychol Sci,2012

4. False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant;JP Simmons;Psychol Sci.,2011

5. Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results;R Silberzahn;Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3