Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus with Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Systematic Review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus with Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Systematic Review

Published:2013-07-24 Issue:7 Volume:8 Page:e70586
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLoS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Wang Ping,Xu Qin,Sun Qi,Fan Fang-fang,Guo Xue-rui,Guo Fei

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference63 articles.

1. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials for the CONSORT Group;KF Schulz;BMJ 340,2010

2. Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials;SH Halpern;Int J Obstet Anesth,2004

3. Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery;NK Erin;J Neurosurg,2011

4. Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the three leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine;L Wang;Trials,2010

5. Natural medicines used in the traditional Chinese medical system for therapy of diabetes mellitus;WL Li;J Ethnopharmacol,2004

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The impact of non-pharmacological approaches on post-cesarean ileus: A critical review;Payesh (Health Monitor) Journal;2024-04-01

2. A Literature Quality Assessment System for Randomized Controlled Trial Literature in Traditional Chinese Medicine (Preprint);2022-03-15

3. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among Chinese Elderly;Nutrition Today;2021-05

4. Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials for the Treatment of Eczema with Chinese Patent Medicine Based on the CONSORT-CHM Formulas 2017;Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine;2020-09-15

5. Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update;Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare;2018-09