A Literature Quality Assessment System for Randomized Controlled Trial Literature in Traditional Chinese Medicine (Preprint)

Author:

Zhang Yunan,Li Yizhen,Dou Zhili,Liu Heyuan,Huang Zhe,Xu Shujing,Zhao Lei,Sun Haonan,Liu Zhen,Liu Yixing,Han Dongran

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In previous studies, researchers only evaluated the scores and grades of TCM clinical randomized controlled works of literature from an overall level, which gave us a general understanding of the overall literature level.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to establish a literature quality assessment system specialized for randomized controlled trial (RCT) literature in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).

METHODS

We combined the general international standard and characteristics of TCM to form a checklist of literature content to be evaluated in terms of basic method information and intervention operations. Then, we established a literature information rating system to classify the focused contents into four categories in terms of varied degree of completeness and accuracy.

RESULTS

Based on this system, we systematically assessed the quality of 2,776 RCTs in six categories of diseases in TCM. For the basic method information in these RCTs, “outcome indicators” and “participants’ medical sources” were mentioned in most of cases, but they might be described in a vague way, with accurate rates of 60.73% and 74.52% among the cases mentioned these information; “TCM diagnosis and diagnostic basis”, “TCM syndromes”, “randomization methods”, and “blinding” were often missing, with missing rates ranging from 68.58% to 97.48%. For the intervention information in these RCTs, the complete and accurate information for the “treatment group intervention” was higher at 97.83%, compared to 82.68% for the “control group intervention”. Most of the inaccurate information occurred when only the name of an intervention operation or drug was given, but the operation’s specific contents or drug’s composition were not clearly expressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested a serious concern that TCM-related concepts were often missing in trail designs for TCM RCTs, which might impede the development of TCM theories. Also, inaccurate trail designs and intervention descriptions indicated in this study can serve as negative examples for future RCT protocols or reports in TCM to avoid.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3