What Tweets and YouTube comments have in common? Sentiment and graph analysis on data related to US elections 2020

Author:

Shevtsov AlexanderORCID,Oikonomidou MariaORCID,Antonakaki DespoinaORCID,Pratikakis Polyvios,Ioannidis Sotiris

Abstract

Most studies analyzing political traffic on Social Networks focus on a single platform, while campaigns and reactions to political events produce interactions across different social media. Ignoring such cross-platform traffic may lead to analytical errors, missing important interactions across social media that e.g. explain the cause of trending or viral discussions. This work links Twitter and YouTube social networks using cross-postings of video URLs on Twitter to discover the main tendencies and preferences of the electorate, distinguish users and communities’ favouritism towards an ideology or candidate, study the sentiment towards candidates and political events, and measure political homophily. This study shows that Twitter communities correlate with YouTube comment communities: that is, Twitter users belonging to the same community in the Retweet graph tend to post YouTube video links with comments from YouTube users belonging to the same community in the YouTube Comment graph. Specifically, we identify Twitter and YouTube communities, we measure their similarity and differences and show the interactions and the correlation between the largest communities on YouTube and Twitter. To achieve that, we have gather a dataset of approximately 20M tweets and the comments of 29K YouTube videos; we present the volume, the sentiment, and the communities formed in YouTube and Twitter graphs, and publish a representative sample of the dataset, as allowed by the corresponding Twitter policy restrictions.

Funder

European Commission, project CONCORDIA

European Union and Greek National Funds

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference126 articles.

1. Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration;PN Howard;Journal of information technology & politics,2018

2. Baumgartner JC, Mackay JB, Morris JS, Otenyo EE, Powell L, Smith MM, et al. Communicator-in-chief: How Barack Obama used new media technology to win the White House. Lexington Books; 2010.

3. Social media analysis during political turbulence;D Antonakaki;PloS one,2017

4. Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections;U Yaqub;Government Information Quarterly,2017

5. Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election;G Enli;European Journal of Communication,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3