Abstract
Background
Light pollution could represent one of the main drivers behind the current biodiversity erosion. While the effects of many light components on biodiversity have already been studied, the influence of flicker remains poorly understood. The determination of the threshold frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous by a species, usually called the Critical Fusion Frequency (CFF), could thus help further identify the impacts of artificial lighting on animals.
Objective
This review aimed at answering the following questions: what is the distribution of CFF between species? Are there differences in how flicker is perceived between taxonomic classes? Which species are more at risk of being impacted by artificial lighting flicker?
Methods
Citations were extracted from three literature databases and were then screened successively on their titles, abstracts and full-texts. Included studies were critically appraised to assess their validity. All relevant data were extracted and analysed to determine the distribution of CFF in the animal kingdom and the influence of experimental designs and species traits on CFF.
Results
At first, 4881 citations were found. Screening and critical appraisal provided 200 CFF values for 156 species. Reported values of CFF varied from a maximum of between 300 Hz and 500 Hz for the beetle Melanophila acuminata D. to a mean of 0.57 (± 0.08) Hz for the snail Lissachatina fulica B. Insects and birds had higher CFF than all other studied taxa. Irrespective of taxon, nocturnal species had lower CFF than diurnal and crepuscular ones.
Conclusions
We identified nine crepuscular and nocturnal species that could be impacted by the potential adverse effects of anthropogenic light flicker. We emphasize that there remains a huge gap in our knowledge of flicker perception by animals, which could potentially be hampering our understanding of its impacts on biodiversity, especially in key taxa like bats, nocturnal birds and insects.
Funder
AFE
ACE
Citeos
PatriNat (French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) – French National Museum of Natural History (MNHN) – French National Centre for Scientific Research
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference65 articles.
1. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Summary for policymakers of the IPBES global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. 2019. Available from: 10.5281/zenodo.3553579
2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. UICN Red List 2017–2020 Report. 2021. Available from: https://nc.iucnredlist.org/redlist/resources/files/1630480997-IUCN_RED_LIST_QUADRENNIAL_REPORT_2017-2020.pdf
3. First Estimation of Global Trends in Nocturnal Power Emissions Reveals Acceleration of Light Pollution;A Sánchez de Miguel;Remote Sensing,2021
4. Light pollution as a biodiversity threat;F Hölker;Trends Ecol Evol,2010
5. 11 Pressing Research Questions on How Light Pollution Affects Biodiversity;F Hölker;Front Ecol Evol,2021
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献