Abstract
Extraversion is the best and most consistent predictor of important leadership outcomes. However, there has been little exploration and examination of the mechanisms underlying the effects of extraverted leadership on performance. Drawing on distal-proximal motivational theory and situational strength theory, the present study proposes and examines a moderated mediation model that explains how leader extraversion affects team performance and how situational characteristics strengthen or constrain this relationship. Respondents were recruited through management team training courses run by the eight Chinese companies. We conducted two rounds of electronic questionnaire collection. The first round of data was collected during the training session. Four weeks later, we collected the data through the training courses’ WeChat groups. Data collected from 226 Chinese team leaders was analyzed using SPSS 26 and Mplus 7. We find that leader extraversion predicts team performance through a motivational mechanism operationalized as leader work engagement. We further find that goal clarity and process clarity play an important role in strengthening the positive effect of leader extraversion on leader work engagement as well as the motivational mechanism, providing an empirical explanation of how leader extraversion affects team performance through a motivational mechanism operationalized as leader work engagement. We also explore how two potential situational characteristics, operationalized as goal clarity and process clarity of leaders, affect the relationship between leader extraversion and leader work engagement as well as the motivational mechanism. Addionally, the findings suggest important practical implications for the organizations seeking to identify effective team leaders.
Funder
Beijing Municipal Education Commission
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference44 articles.
1. Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review;T. A. Judge;Journal of applied psychology,2002
2. Costa, Paul T., and Robert R. McCrae. Neo personality inventory-revised (NEO PI-R). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
3. House R J. A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. Faculty of Management Studies, University of Toronto, 1977.
4. Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy;K Y Ng;Journal of Applied Psychology,2008
5. State extraversion and emergent leadership: Do introverts emerge as leaders when they act like extraverts?;A Spark;The Leadership Quarterly,2021
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献