Abstract
Several studies have explored the relationship between socially constructed neighbourhood boundaries (henceforth social boundaries) and ethnic tensions. To measure these relationships, studies have used area-level demographic data to predict the location of social boundaries and their characteristics. The most common approach uses areal wombling to locate neighbouring areas with large differences in residential characteristics. Areas with large differences (or higher boundary values) are used as a proxy for well-defined social boundaries. However, to date, the results of these predictions have never been empirically validated. This article presents results from a simple discrete choice experiment designed to test whether the areal wombling approach to boundary detection produces social boundaries that are recognisable to local residents and experts as such. We conducted a small feasibility trial with residents and experts in Rotherham, England. Our results shows that participants were more likely to recognise boundaries with higher boundary values as local community borders. We end with a discussion on the scalability of the design and suggest future improvements.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference22 articles.
1. Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community;E. Anderson;University of Chicago Press,2013
2. Subjective Constructions of Neighborhood Boundaries: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Four Neighborhoods;E Campbell;J Urban Aff,2009
3. Black picket fences: Privilege & peril among the black middle class;M. Pattillo;University of Chicago Press,2013
4. “It Depends on How You Define Integrated”: Neighborhood Boundaries and Racial Integration in a Baltimore Neighborhood;MA Rich;Sociol Forum,2009
5. The Spatial Structure and Local Experience of Residential Segregation;E Roberto;Spat Demogr,2021