The Spatial Structure and Local Experience of Residential Segregation

Author:

Roberto ElizabethORCID,Korver-Glenn Elizabeth

Abstract

AbstractThis study examines the extent to which road connectivity and physical barriers—such as highways, railroad tracks, and waterways—structure spatial patterns of racial and ethnic residential segregation and shape how segregation is locally experienced by residents. Our focus is on physical barriers that are also social boundaries—features of the built environment that reduce physical connectivity and mark a social boundary between geographic areas. We measure residential segregation with attention to the proximity and road connectivity between locations, which allows us to identify areas where physical barriers mark a social boundary between geographic areas with different racial and ethnic compositions. Our approach integrates ethnographic observation of three such areas in Houston, Texas, to investigate residents' perceptions and local experience of social and spatial division. The results reveal that physical barriers are associated with heightened levels of ethnoracial segregation, and residents experience the barriers as symbolic markers of perceived distinctions between groups and physical impediments to social connection. Although barriers like highways, railroad tracks, and bayous are not inherently harbingers of ethnoracial segregation, our study demonstrates that physical barriers can provide the infrastructure for social boundaries and facilitate durable neighborhood racial divisions.

Funder

James S. McDonnell Foundation

Rice University Social Sciences Research Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference85 articles.

1. Ananat, E. O. (2011). The wrong side(s) of the tracks: The causal effects of racial segregation on urban poverty and inequality. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 34–66

2. Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. University of Chicago Press.

3. Appel, A. (2012). Tear down fence? Idea shelved. New Haven Independent, Aug 30. https://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/tear_down_fence_never_mind/.

4. Armborst, T., D'Oca, D., & Theodore, G. (Eds). (2017). The arsenal of exclusion/Inclusion. Actar.

5. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2004). Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of elites and time-space trajectories of segregation. Housing Studies, 19(6), 875–892

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3