Abstract
AbstractThis study examines the extent to which road connectivity and physical barriers—such as highways, railroad tracks, and waterways—structure spatial patterns of racial and ethnic residential segregation and shape how segregation is locally experienced by residents. Our focus is on physical barriers that are also social boundaries—features of the built environment that reduce physical connectivity and mark a social boundary between geographic areas. We measure residential segregation with attention to the proximity and road connectivity between locations, which allows us to identify areas where physical barriers mark a social boundary between geographic areas with different racial and ethnic compositions. Our approach integrates ethnographic observation of three such areas in Houston, Texas, to investigate residents' perceptions and local experience of social and spatial division. The results reveal that physical barriers are associated with heightened levels of ethnoracial segregation, and residents experience the barriers as symbolic markers of perceived distinctions between groups and physical impediments to social connection. Although barriers like highways, railroad tracks, and bayous are not inherently harbingers of ethnoracial segregation, our study demonstrates that physical barriers can provide the infrastructure for social boundaries and facilitate durable neighborhood racial divisions.
Funder
James S. McDonnell Foundation
Rice University Social Sciences Research Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. Ananat, E. O. (2011). The wrong side(s) of the tracks: The causal effects of racial segregation on urban poverty and inequality. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 34–66
2. Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. University of Chicago Press.
3. Appel, A. (2012). Tear down fence? Idea shelved. New Haven Independent, Aug 30. https://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/tear_down_fence_never_mind/.
4. Armborst, T., D'Oca, D., & Theodore, G. (Eds). (2017). The arsenal of exclusion/Inclusion. Actar.
5. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2004). Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of elites and time-space trajectories of segregation. Housing Studies, 19(6), 875–892
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献